I agree with the Roe decision only with regard to its saying that the Founders did not intend to create protection for fetal life from conception.
Since abortion prior to quickening was legal in every state at the time, and restrictions were enacted only gradually over the 19th century, that conclusion to me seems inevitable.
I would, however, be all in favor of states restricting or prohibiting abortion entirely, or an amendment that would do so.
My objection is constitutional, not that I approve of abortion.
You can tell a tree by its fruit.
The evil fruit of the Blackmun/Roe drumming out of the unborn from the human race with a nonsensical, unscientific, immoral reading of the word “person,” is more than sixty million butchered innocents, with their posterity also blotted out.
The fruit of recognizing the obvious natural fact of the personhood of all, at every stage of human development, would be the restoration of equal protection for the supreme God-given, unalienable rights of all, and the restoration of the foundations of justice and the rule of true law in America.
Go ahead, keep dehumanizing the most helpless and ddefenseless among us. But it will cost you everything, including your freedom. Along with Thomas Jefferson, ‘tremble for your country when you reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever.’