Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

I’m not pretending that there was anything “legal” about our declaring independence from England. We were challenging the existing government. And, we expected a fight. And, we got a fight. And, we won. We overthrew the existing government in the Colonies.


884 posted on 08/03/2015 3:04:48 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 881 | View Replies ]


To: Tau Food
I’m not pretending that there was anything “legal” about our declaring independence from England. We were challenging the existing government.

Presumably since we "won" our challenge, the new paradigm is the principles we had put forth.

The Converse is that we were still following English law in regards to Independence. No, I think we were supposed to follow American law, Specifically the first one.

"That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved;

In other words we changed the rules, and then Lincoln insisted on going back to the British rules; That Independence is not a right.

888 posted on 08/03/2015 3:15:13 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson