[paladinan]

What part of the article do you disagree with?

First, for the fact that it was an editorial, and not an "article", which you quoted.

Second, for your comment which said, "The Wisconsin Journal Sentinel is a Pulitzer prize winning publication." I do not disagree with the bare fact, but I certainly disagree with your suggestion that this shows the MJS to be impeccable, or even unbiased. No one who read it with any frequency could possibly say such a thing, and imply such a thing.

You'll note that my comment was restricted to the MJS topic, and it alone?

[centurion316]

Conservativejoy is playing a very sophisticated game, professional I would guess.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3320278/posts?page=31#31

[conservativejoy]

There is plenty of information out there on this. If someone has an article refuting the content of the post, I’ll certainly take a look at it, but the personal attacks and not providing any information that refutes the content of the article are just hollow whistling past the grave yard.