Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cheerio
A 105mm cannon? Dang! That's make the plane buck!


9 posted on 08/11/2015 8:45:12 AM PDT by Gamecock (Many Atheists: "There is no God and I hate Him!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Gamecock

They just need to point it to the rear.


10 posted on 08/11/2015 8:47:55 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Gamecock

AC 130 Gunship in action, "awsome footage". go to 3:55

US AC-130 Gunship 40mm & 105mm Cannon Firing Night Version
24 posted on 08/11/2015 12:39:20 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Gamecock; Cannoneer No. 4; Darksheare
A 105mm cannon? Dang! That's make the plane buck!?

Not as bad as you might think. It's a variation of the XM204 *soft recoil* type gun mount. Of which there's also a 155mm version, though the projectiles are larger, and fewer could be carried aboard an aircraft. The 105 is likely the way to go, even if the larger gun could be so mounted.

Interestingly, there was a concept a couple of years back to mount a pair of XM204s on either side, aboard a CH47C *$hi!hook* [officially, Chinook helicopter. Don't know how well flight firing tests for that one worked out, but it's interesting to see that the Army has been thinking of alternate possibilities just in case the USAF decides to drop the A10 altogether.


29 posted on 08/18/2015 9:27:10 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson