Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Democratic-Republican

My cable co still has analog signal, so my comment about analog does appy.

I have Cox Cable and have been getting bits and pieces of info via emails and snailmails.

From what I understand, all Cox cable TV will require a box (mini or big). They seem to be saying: Analog TV signal will be dead -- no longer offered. Digital TV signal will require either a mini-box or big box. You CANNOT connect a direct line from the outlet to the TV, because the signal (ALL CHANNELS) will be encrypted and will need a box.

The mini-box unencrypts signals through the basic and first major tier only. The big box will be needed to get premium channels, sports and movie tiers, etc.

One mailing said that the conversion would be at some October date, but another notification said encryption would start in early January 2016.

Link for Cox Cable information:

It's Time to Go All Digital

Scroll down at that link to the MINIBOX Alternative to compare the mini-box and big box channels.
17 posted on 08/16/2015 3:41:36 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy
Well I gotta admit that I was wrong. It appears that your COX cable is willing to juggle hand grenades.

"TVs Requiring Mini Box

TVs that connect to Cox service directly from a cable wall outlet aren't ready to go all digital. Even if your TV is labeled "digital ready", you'll still need to connect with a mini box.

TVs that connect using video equipment, like a Cox Advanced TV Receiver or CableCARD, are ready to go all digital and don't need a mini box."

There's much bullcrap in there technically speaking, but it is clever and disguised. It is obviously written to snowjob the 90% of the sheeple that have no clue.

The key is "TVs that connect to Cox service". The rest of it implies that TV's connected to a coax wall outlet are NOT digital blahblahblah. In reality most TV's these days days are perfectly digital ready. What they fail to stress is that this is a COX implementation of total encryption, rendering perfectly normal TV's with analog/digital or digital only built-in tuners obsolete, little more than LCD computer monitors.

Many details found in this thread, one of thousands.

An employee or knee-bending sycophant says this ...

"Currently Cox Does NOT encrypt:

  • The low quality Analog channels, this includes most 4:3 SD channels 2 thru 99, but Cox has been slowly removing some of those Analog channels. (The removal of the rest of the Analog channels should have happened in 2012, but Cox has been very generous and has left them until this year.)

  • The Local Broadcast Digital HD channels and Local Digital SD sub-channels.

Currently Cox Does already encrypt:

  • All Non-Local Digital channels, whether 4:3 SD or 16:9 HD

The two things changing are the encrypting of the Local Digital channels, and the complete removal of the 4:3 SD Analog channels.

The complete removal of the 4:3 SD Analog channels is absolutely necessary and should have been done a few years ago. Every other major provider in major cities has already done this.

The encryption of the Local Broadcast Digital HD channels and Local Digital SD sub-channels, is overkill in my opinion, but does keep freeloaders from getting Internet and Free TV. It also keeps Cox from having to send out technicians to place filters on drops, and keeps people from attempting to do a DIY illegal cable hook-up, which could effect your service negatively, especially if it was one of your neighbors.

Do you really want all your neighbors getting free TV when you pay $90/mo for it?"

Buttloads of snarky bulls!t. Reminds of Microsoft in their Vista and then Windows 8 propaganda periods with Steven Sinofsky and his team of destroyers.

In that last sentence, amusingly and presumably with a perfectly straight face they try to pit you against all your neighbors, while literally forgetting that it is YOU who now get to pay for their new encrypted implementation to stop the alleged thieves!

Even if it is a futile effort, each customer should contact their House Rep and two Senators ( that's 3 reports per customer ) and not ask, but demand an antitrust breakup of these COX suckers. It as an elaborate bait and switch that renders your private property inoperative without sending them more cash. It would be like Standard Oil switching to some new formulation that rendered car engines obsolete ( or similar metaphor ). I see they do have one cable competitor in place in some areas, and no doubt they would point to them, but read some of the crappy remarks in that thread to see what they really think of them. They are merely a foil for this monopolistic and predatory practice ( kinda like Microsoft using Linux as a "competitor", "no monopoly here!" ).

Remind me who in Congress we need to thank for the cable and other information delivery consolidation again. We are literally awash in protected monopolies now, too big to fail because of the extent of their lobbying. I used to think Teddy Roosevelt was crazy, but not anymore. These companies really do see their particular zones as farm fields full of sheep to be sheared at will.

18 posted on 08/16/2015 6:35:51 PM PDT by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson