Some of these people have said it’s perfectly justified for a husband to pursue homosexual affairs if his wife won’t engage in sodomy. After all, she’s not the, ahem, orifice she was before having children.
I’m tempted to have my daughters read some of this stuff as “aversion therapy”: “My dears, you can’t recognize these nutters just by looking at them. Old Maid With Cats is a perfectly legitimate life path.”
Are wives and husband suppose to have sex with each other? Of course.
Is one declining to go along with a certain fantasy or act excuse for the other to cheat? No.
Not sure why this is even an issue.
And Anna's partly blaming herself? Normal.
Wives and husbands, tend when something goes wrong with the other, to indulge in the "if only's".
95% of the time there was nothing realistically they could have done but they still do it.
It's called love.
I concur. No harm in learning that people aren’t always what they appear to be...and that there is a world full of enablers out there ready to defend the indefensible.
And after re-reading the article, I can’t help but wonder if the media savvy Duggars are the “family insiders” releasing this enabling, non quotable BS to uphold their Gothard lifestyle?
I hope Anna Duggars parents (or maybe a non-brainwashed friend if she has any one on the outside of this cult) gets her some legal representation. I can’t help but wonder if this sorta blame the victim trash talk isn’t more about pre-emptively saving Josh’s material assets in a divorce (see your Honor, she too was to blame!) than saving his soul, because I don’t think this bunch would dare utter the words “pre-nup” but I just feel in my bones they (Duggars, Inc.) want to protect Josh’s cash flow.