Not at all, what's going on here is that you are not longer disputing Cruz's position on mass legalization. It's not the same thing.
Cruz is a proven Constitutional conservative with a proven record of arguing against government over-reach.
His support for TPPA so now Obama will only need a simple majority to get his crap pashed, as well as his position in immigration, would argue that he isn't as pure as you claim!
As for the CFR document, no where in there does it say that Heidi Cruz co-authored it. .
Her name is on it at the very bottom!
She might also, however, have been very vocal in opposition to the open borders parts of the report. We don’t know!
Why be a member of globalist organizations, making money with entities determined to see through a north American EU, and sign your name to documents that are-- even in their most moderate incarnation-- entirely destructive to this country? And when her leftist professor vouches that she wouldn't be "in those kinds of circles" if not for Ted, how is that not evidence of anything? Why is it that Ted Cruz himself still supports legalization of aliens in this country?
Her name is listed as a member of the council. Not as a co-author of the position paper. Trust me, you can serve on a committee and not co-author a position paper.
I DID address your claims about mass legalization.
TPA and TPP needed to be passed by both the House and the Senate because they are revenue/tarriff bills and that is a Constitutional mandate (that such bills originate in the House). TPA is not presidential over-reach.
AGAIN: ONE of Mrs. Cruz’s lefty professors stating that she would “not be in these circles without Ted” is HIS opinion. They met while working on the Bush campaign in 2000. She’s worked with Bolton. She might not be the fire-brand conservative that Ted is, but she’s certainly no closet Hillary.