Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I'm for Trump
9/09/2015 | Nikos1121

Posted on 09/09/2015 3:35:20 AM PDT by nikos1121

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last
To: nikos1121

Here’s what I see at CNN:

http://www.cnn.com/tv

Which I’m watching now, because Fox chased me away. :D


41 posted on 09/09/2015 5:44:38 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I agree. I’m actually listening to CNN and MSNBC of late. Better coverage of Trump.


42 posted on 09/09/2015 5:46:33 AM PDT by nikos1121 ("There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

I don’t know the answer to your question but the one thing that comes through in Trump’s book is that he will put America, Americans, our military, and our law enforcement first in any decision he makes.

That is why I trust him on immigration and even some of the things I wince at.

You can better understand some of his controversial statements when you understand where they come from.


43 posted on 09/09/2015 5:52:00 AM PDT by Amntn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
I am all about immigration reform. Stop the illegal border jumping. And severely limit legal immigration to 150,000 or less a year. Why? So our grandchildren are not strangers in their own country.

www.numbersusa.com

My second issue is tax reform and the only way I think is this way. www.thetransactiontax.org

I like Donald Trump, and I hope he will succeed in making American Great Again!

44 posted on 09/09/2015 5:52:08 AM PDT by agincourt1415 (Trump-Cruz 2016 the Dream Ticket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
Tax reform will bring back American Production!

What if the U.S. was free of income both personal and corporate? Would that bring back manufacturing?

www.thetransactiontax.org

Check the above link.

45 posted on 09/09/2015 5:55:47 AM PDT by agincourt1415 (Trump-Cruz 2016 the Dream Ticket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39
That involves still government control and regulation which is counterproductive. Just take away the regulatory and tax burden and that flooding of the American market becomes unprofitable and will slow drastically. Trying to tit for foreigners' tat just invites more and more micromanagemanent and reduction in American production. However you design it, it, tariffs or trade controls, the result is the same, inhibition of American business and reduction of American jobs.

What looks on the surface to be just plain common sense doe s not take into consideration the secondry and tertiary effects of an action. Read Henry Hazlitt's Economics in One Lesson. It is a short book and will give you an amazing talent for economic reasoning. Once you read it you will never again be swayed by politicians' arguments for enacting things to benefit certain groups. Your mind will automatically hear the argument then say "and then ...and then... and the result will be worse for all concerned."

Also Here

and here

46 posted on 09/09/2015 6:04:37 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
No, it’s Sowell who is not agreeing with Trump.

That's absurd. Sowell is 23-24 years older than Trump, and been a leading conservative economist and commentator 50 years longer than Trump has been conservative on anything. What a classic fan boi kool aid knee pad response. There are intelligent ways to respond to my question while still supporting Trump, but you totally missed it.

47 posted on 09/09/2015 6:06:51 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

you can’t dent the anti trade freepers. They’re so Bernie Sanders liberal on this one issue, and way too blind to have an open mind.


48 posted on 09/09/2015 6:07:57 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Hey Einstein, we are already in a trade war with the rest of the world it’s just we refuse to fight. They can’t retaliate against import tariffs because our exports are already tariff!


49 posted on 09/09/2015 6:08:25 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: agincourt1415

Red states are booming in manufacturing.....we don’t have to do anything but make the country more like the red states.


50 posted on 09/09/2015 6:08:32 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Conservatism doesn’t have to die,it just has to be kept in chains by the GOPe. That’s why I support Trump. Every other candidate will play the establishment’s game hoping to win.


51 posted on 09/09/2015 6:08:33 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Lex rex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Early on before i really knew anything about obama i actually, for a brief moment, gave him the benefit of doubt.
That is until he started cozying up to Teddy K. About the same time his radical asscociations became known.
Then i knew what he was all about.
So, far Trump has cozied up to all right people.
He is dispised by all the right people,too. Most who have attacked him at their own risk.
He has got the GOP scrabbling. THeir designated loser Jeb is not going to go up against Hillary or whoever.
And Cruz, who we all agree is the most Constitionally saavy, and definitely smart, is neck and neck with Low-T Jeb?

Sooooo....


52 posted on 09/09/2015 6:09:38 AM PDT by Leep (Cut the crap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Here’s the main reason I will support him. He pisses off the GOPe AND he’s not a democrat. Everyone else is sleeping with each other and just figuring out how to buy more votes with our grandkids money...and by grandkids I mean kids that aren’t even born yet.

At least I’ll get some entertainment in the news as I watch Trump fight with the politicians and bully everyone around. It will be a fun experience and can’t be worse than the last 25+ years of garbage politicians.


53 posted on 09/09/2015 6:09:48 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agincourt1415

Transaction taxes as periodically proposed by socialists and controllers would be more insidious than the income tax. It was proposed for us just a few years ago that there be a tax on all transactions of a mere 1/2 %. Transfers of funds in your bank are such transfers. Every time you write a check or move money from one account to another or receive money into your account or use an ATM there is that 1/2 % tax. It can add up to a huge portion of one’s income or a business’s income. I figured out what that would do to me with my small income and it would put me into actual poverty. I admit, I didn’t go to the link. I have heard too much about and read too much about various transfer tax proposals to even want to hear any more arguments for them.


54 posted on 09/09/2015 6:11:03 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

tariffs against countries that aren’t playing fair (like China) is good. Currency manipulation in China isn’t fair/free trade. So Tariffs are a way to keep the Chinese Yuan at the right level as China tries to manipulate their economy by stealing from others.


55 posted on 09/09/2015 6:11:30 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39
We accept imports from other countries at the same level they accept exports from us.

We don't trade "as a country" - we have individuals and individual companies that make deals that are in the best interest of their American customers, American investors and American employees. Besides, your plan is undoable. It would require some bureaucrat deciding what is good trade and what is bad trade. In other words, it's just another liberal government control program, preferring the wisdom of bureaucracies to independent businesses. It's centralized control under a more benign name.

56 posted on 09/09/2015 6:11:32 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

I totally reject any argument that makes the assumption that our only choices are Trump and the GOP e. If it comes down to that, I’m all in for Trump, no questions asked. BUT ITS NOT DOWN TO THAT NOW.

Can you make an argument that doesn’t require a phony premise?


57 posted on 09/09/2015 6:12:51 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: central_va
9/9/2015, 8:07:57 AM · 48 of 54 C. Edmund Wright to arthurus

you can’t dent the anti trade freepers. They’re so Bernie Sanders liberal on this one issue, and way too blind to have an open mind.

58 posted on 09/09/2015 6:13:33 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
I see so many pro-tariff posters here on FR these days.

If this were anything like a majority view in the country, there would be American manufacturers of cameras, toasters, TV's, and dress shirts working like crazy to meet the demand for USA-made products made by American workers earning American wages.

Where are they?? NOWHERE.

This leads me to believe that (1) most of the pro-tariff people are blowing smoke, or (2) there really aren't enough of them to keep even a single strip mall busy.

59 posted on 09/09/2015 6:14:21 AM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Our President does not set monetary policy for China. That’s a fantasy. A pipe dream. Trump was all about negotiating better with OPEC just a couple year ago...then American production made OPEC irrelevant. Trump’s negotiating never would have. Same with China. We can beat China, or more likely, win while China wins, getting government the hell out of the way. No super savior President is going to do anything about it. The Trump name means nothing in China.

And BTW, some American and some American companies and some American workers are helped when China’s currency is weak. Who the hell are you to say those are inferior to others?


60 posted on 09/09/2015 6:15:22 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson