Posted on 09/14/2015 12:22:23 PM PDT by Swordmaker
I’m not challenging that AES is the most secure method of encryption known to man, as I never said it wasn’t. Again, I’m challenging your statement of impervious. You can’t state something to be impervious if there is any chance, no matter how unlikely or how long it would take, that it could be cracked, it isn’t impervious.
Confucius say_ FanBot who buy more AAPL in for bumpy slide
Ah, you are one of those. . . as in those who think that just because it's impervious now and for the foreseeable future, we should denigrate it because it might be, someday, be breeched by your magic algorithm and amazingly fast super-computer that no one today can even conceive of a way to even approach the problem. I see.
I told you, you believe in magic.
". . .any chance, no matter how unlikely, or how long it would take. . . "
Do you realize how unreasonable your criteria is? I just showed you that your being able to "crack" into such a complex encryption would be on the order of is really on the order of having a proton spontaneously evaporate in your cup of coffee tomorrow morning. Yes, that COULD happen, but the odds of it happening in PJBankard's coffee tomorrow morning are so slim as to as close to zero as it's close to get, yet that event is far more likely than someone coming up with a "Crack" of AES 256 encryption in your lifetime or mine. . . or your grandchindren's.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.