This is far from the only example:
When Trump says nice things about Hillary and Obama, he is being a shrewd businessman; when Fiorina does it, she is showing she is a RINO.
When Trump donates to Democrats, he is merely "playing the game"; when Fiorina does it, she is showing her true colors.
When Trump changes his position from pro-choice to pro-life, it is because it is a sincere change of heart; when Fiorina does it, it is just a ploy to win votes.
When Trump makes insulting comments about other candidate, he is "showing that he knows how to fight"; when any other candidate criticizes Trump for ANYTHING, they are just a tool of the establishment trying to take Trump down.
When Hillary and the Dems tried to stop Citizens United from showing their film about Hillary, conservatives were outraged about the attack on the 1st Amendment; when Trump threatens to sue the CFG to force them to stop airing negative ads about him, Trump supporters say "what 1st Amendment?"
I could go on, but you get the point...
It's not required to post articles from leftists to understand Fiorina was a business disaster. There are sources all over the place. Have you not seen them?
Name Fiorina's success stories. Do they outweigh the failures? Now, name Trump's success stories. Do they outweigh the failures? See the difference?
The amazing thing about this to me is that the same Trump supporters who will post and cite comments from leftist economics professors to support their contention that Fiorina was such a bad businessperson will howl and scream when another leftist economics professor says something negative about Trump’s business practices. Login and intellectual consistency does not seem to be their strong suit.
I agree 100% Trump makes boiler room schemes look legit.