[the OlLine Rebel]

Why is this so hard to believe? It’s true in many cases as it is. No reason to discount females influencing directly what to do, or indirectly. It happens in lower mammals as well.

This is not much different than discovering that Christianity wasn’t that bad for women, nor the USA and its Constitution.

[DH]

Why is this so hard to believe?

---

I don’t think you were able to comprehend my response to the article. It was not whether women influenced the lifestyles, it was the fact that these “experts” had absolutely no way to come up with “hard” proof to support that statement. How could they? There was no tangible proof, simply conjecture.

My statement has nothing to do with women’s equality...it has to do with “so called experts” coming up with beliefs rather than proof.

Global warming is a perfect example of today’s “experts” coming up with fake and false statements to support their agenda.

[PapaBear3625]

Why is this so hard to believe?

It's not a case of it being easy or hard to believe. It's amusement over "scientists" making definitive statements about something they can only speculate about.

As others have noted, neolithic people who modern men HAVE had a chance to study over the last few hundred years (American Indians) were not feminist societies, which casts doubt over the speculations of these guys.