Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Rules Texas Can Enforce Voter ID Law
texas tribune ^
| 12:45 p.m. EDT October 18, 2014
| Richard Wolf, USA
Posted on 10/21/2015 12:22:24 PM PDT by Mr. K
The U.S. Supreme Court early Saturday denied a last-ditch effort to block the enforcement of Texas' controversial voter ID law in the upcoming elections.
The ruling comes two days before the start of early voting. Election Day is Nov. 4.
Six of the nine justices agreed to deny a request to vacate Tuesday’s judgment from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the state could enforce the law. The opinion removes the last traces of uncertainty over whether the law — which supporters say prevents voter fraud — would be in effect for the start of early voting.
(Excerpt) Read more at texastribune.org ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2014; 2016election; election2016; electionfraud; oldnews; tedcruz; texas; votefraud; voterfraud; voterid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
So VOTER ID IS NOW LEGAL IN ALL 50 STATES, right? This is how they 'ruled' that gay marriage was legal.
1
posted on
10/21/2015 12:22:24 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
To: Mr. K
Texas is on a bit of a roll lately.
2
posted on
10/21/2015 12:24:56 PM PDT
by
jospehm20
To: Mr. K
The problem: 3 justices think it is wrong to have an ID. Who are they?
To: Mr. K
4
posted on
10/21/2015 12:25:33 PM PDT
by
TEXOKIE
(We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
To: Mr. K
Yea!
Love wins!!!!
=
Now lets put this law in effect in all the swing states and cut down on demoncRAT voter fraud.
5
posted on
10/21/2015 12:25:36 PM PDT
by
Angels27
To: Mr. K
EXCELLENT point. Take THAT, illegal alien Dem operatives! They’ll STILL show their driver’s licenses if they get them in Texas which I’m not sure about that.
To: Mr. K
I missed that. GREAT news.
7
posted on
10/21/2015 12:26:34 PM PDT
by
tioga
To: Mr. K
6 of 9, impressive.
Go Texas!
8
posted on
10/21/2015 12:26:39 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
To: Mr. K
Outstanding!
0bama, Holder and Loretta Lynch are deeply saddened.
9
posted on
10/21/2015 12:28:06 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
To: SoFloFreeper
10
posted on
10/21/2015 12:28:15 PM PDT
by
boomop1
(Term limits is the only source of change.)
To: Mr. K
You mean the Supreme Court did the bare minimum expected of them for a free country’s survival? Color me surprised.
11
posted on
10/21/2015 12:28:27 PM PDT
by
Crucial
(At the heart all leftists is the fear that the truth is bigger than themselves.)
To: SoFloFreeper
At least it’s not hanging on by the precarious 5-4 thread like so much is.
To: Mr. K
I beleive the Supreme Court decided this in 2010. There are rogue leftist judges who ignore the Supreme Court decision time and time again.
To: Mr. K; onyx; Hunton Peck; Diana in Wisconsin; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; Wisconsinlady; ...
SCOTUS rules Tex voter ID law is Constitutional. Good news for voters of Wisconsin.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
To: Mr. K
"So VOTER ID IS NOW LEGAL IN ALL 50 STATES, right? This is how they 'ruled' that gay marriage was legal."
No, this was a 5th Circuit ruling not a USSC ruling. The USSC merely refused to overturn the 5th Circuit ruling.
To: jazusamo
Can you say LAME DUCK? :)
16
posted on
10/21/2015 12:30:24 PM PDT
by
Crucial
(At the heart all leftists is the fear that the truth is bigger than themselves.)
To: Mr. K
From 2014, why is this not working???
17
posted on
10/21/2015 12:31:16 PM PDT
by
100American
(Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
To: Mr. K
[So VOTER ID IS NOW LEGAL IN ALL 50 STATES, right?
This is how they 'ruled' that gay marriage was legal. ]
Oh! you are so precious!
Liberal Supreme Court Playbook:
A decision in your favor is a decision that is unconditionally settled!
A decision NOT in your favor is a decision that is not yet settled!
18
posted on
10/21/2015 12:33:41 PM PDT
by
GraceG
(Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
To: circlecity
No, this was a 5th Circuit ruling not a USSC ruling. The USSC merely refused to overturn the 5th Circuit ruling. Which is de facto ruling by SCOTUS.
19
posted on
10/21/2015 12:33:57 PM PDT
by
rjsimmon
(The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: Mr. K
20
posted on
10/21/2015 12:35:26 PM PDT
by
grundle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson