Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MamaTexan
You said: “The ninth and tenth amendments were supposed to further insure it was up to the States whether to have slavery or not. Attempting to ‘end slavery’ by any branch of government was, in itself, a treasonous act.”

You are exactly right, and the Congress and President at the time of secession knew that too.

This might reflect media opinion at the time:

Washington March 3, 1861-——Tomorrow President James Buchanan
leaves office having served eight years as the fifteenth Chief Executive of the
United States. Although the secession came during his administration,
despite the withdrawl.of seven southern states, the remaining 18 are intact.

He leaves the United States Constitution residing undisturbed in the capital
in Washington. The House of Representatives and Senate will reconvene as
scheduled in five months. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney will preside over the
next term of the Supreme Court.

The Secretary of War, Joseph Holt reports no military activity in any areas
adjacent to the mason Dixon line. Army Commander General Winfield Scott
reports that the military is billeted as normal.

New York and Boston shipping houses are noting declines in imports landing
at their wharfs, but report that dry goods, machinery, passenger and mail
service with southern ports continues as usual.

With one exception, all federal facilities have been peacefully evacuated with
federal employees, their health intact, returning north by rail or ship.

Confederate government representatives are meeting in Washington with
officials to arrange for payment for these facilities and other debts resulting
from their withdrawal from the Union.

Last November, President Buchanan and Attorney General Black announced
that it was not within the authority of the government to institute military force to
address secession. He is to be congratulated for his respect for the constitution
and the peaceful lives of citizens everywhere.

Secession has removed slavery as an issue for either the courts or the territories,
and no longer preoccupies the interests of the legislature or press.

The following quote is from Mr. Buchanan's most recent address to Congress and demonstrates his respect for the country's future:

“Self-preservation is the first law of nature, and has been
implanted in the heart of man by his Creator for the wisest purpose;
and no political union, however fraught with blessings and benefits
in all other respects, can long continue if the necessary consequence
be to render the homes and the firesides of nearly half the parties to
it habitually and hopelessly insecure."

His commitment is manifest in the armistice arranged for Charleston and Pensacola.

It is now the responsibility of the next executive to maintain this peace.

37 posted on 11/03/2015 12:30:14 PM PST by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: PeaRidge

I would not be staking an argument for anything on the efficacy of James Buchanan. He is universally recognized as our worst President. In recent times he has risen to the status of our second worst President.


39 posted on 11/03/2015 12:50:23 PM PST by Sam Clements
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: PeaRidge
Great post! You're right - newspapers of the time are a great way to get the feel for public opinion in the context of history instead of someones 'interpretation' of it.

I notice they behave as if succession was a given, as well, but why wouldn't they? After all, it IS the way the Founders left the Articles of Confederation.

From the first legal treatise written after Constitutional Ratification:

And since the seceding states, by establishing a new constitution and form of federal government among themselves, without the consent of the rest, have shown that they consider the right to do so whenever the occasion may, in their opinion require it, as unquestionable, we may infer that that right has not been diminished by any new compact which they may since have entered into, since none could be more solemn or explicit than the first, nor more binding upon the contracting parties. Their obligation, therefore, to preserve the present constitution, is not greater than their former obligations were, to adhere to the articles of confederation; each state possessing the same right of withdrawing itself from the confederacy without the consent of the rest, as any number of them do, or ever did, possess.
George Tucker, View of the Constitution of the United States, 1803.

43 posted on 11/03/2015 1:15:32 PM PST by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: PeaRidge

“With one exception, all federal facilities have been peacefully evacuated with federal employees, their health intact, returning north by rail or ship.”

In retrospect, it’s easy to guess that “one exception” was Fort Sumter.

This really puts the nail in the coffin of the argument that the commander of Ft Sumter wasn’t trying to instigate hostilities by holding on to the fort and trying to resupply it. If every single other facility in the southern states had been peacefully evacuated, then there can be no question that the federal government, at least under Buchanan, had decided it would rather preserve the peace than try to stake some claim to government buildings in the South.


59 posted on 11/03/2015 2:46:52 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson