Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

Personally, I don’t need scientific proof..

God said it.

I’m not surprised that the truth of God’ Word would be confirmed once the genome was mapped and the scientific understanding of God”s creation was better understood.

I belied in a literal Adam and Eve, a literal 6-day creation, that Jesus Christ is Lord, and that he is coming again to judge the living and the dead.

I don’t doubt it.


15 posted on 11/05/2015 3:55:19 AM PST by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kinsman redeemer

What *scientists* and *evolutionists* like to do is say that since we can’t *prove* our claims, we must accept their theories because they are *scientific*. IOW, since there is no alternative to something they claim they disproved, and theirs is the only other option out there, it must be true.

Problem is, they can’t *prove* theirs either. Scientists tell us constantly that you can’t disprove a theory, you can only disprove it, but then demand that creationists *prove* the creationist position is correct.

They demand that we do what they won’t do themselves.

So let them do what they demand of us.

We claim creationsism. They can disprove it.


17 posted on 11/05/2015 4:11:11 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson