Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JimRed
Tough call. Neither is sanctioning an unnatural family relationship.

Knowing the homo lobby, they would use their "baptized children" as a battering ram to tear down the church. Kids raised by homo couples have little hope of turning out normal.

If they beat the odds, they can always apply at age 18. I don't see anyway to win this thing.

6 posted on 11/06/2015 1:18:14 PM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

Infant baptism is a promise by the parents to raise their children in the doctrine of that church. By the very fact that Homosexuals would be in active homosexual relationships, whether condoned by civil law or not, would be in direct contradiction of church doctrine and would preclude the child from baptism.


11 posted on 11/06/2015 1:32:50 PM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilanteman

“Knowing the homo lobby, they would use their “baptized children” as a battering ram to tear down the church. Kids raised by homo couples have little hope of turning out normal.

If they beat the odds, they can always apply at age 18. I don’t see anyway to win this thing.”

I see your point.


24 posted on 11/06/2015 2:24:32 PM PST by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson