Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Chainmail
Too much labor and material and expense for too little volume - Wouldn't hold any significant quantity of grain

I didn't say that I believed the pyramids were built for grain storage. I have read extensively about the subject. I'm saying someone who hasn't could believe it without being a wacko.

32 posted on 11/06/2015 7:17:23 PM PST by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Starstruck
I didn't say that I believed the pyramids were built for grain storage. I have read extensively about the subject. I'm saying someone who hasn't could believe it without being a wacko.

Not a wacko. Just a subject-specific moron.

51 posted on 11/06/2015 8:10:56 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Starstruck
"I'm saying someone who hasn't could believe it without being a wacko.

OK, not a wacko - but certainly someone with very little knowledge of that piece of archeology and the lack of judgment to make pronouncements about subjects they don't know much about.

I've been inside all of the pyramids and they are cramped, dark, humid, and absolutely useless for grain storage. Weren't too successful for treasure storage, either.

109 posted on 11/07/2015 10:57:18 AM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson