To: Pelham
Aside from the question of who exactly it was in 1861 that called up an army and commenced hostilities first, how would you feel if today the abortion-minded decided to secede, and raise a rebel army, and fire at federal troops, because they thought their particular bloody trade was threatened by the election of a candidate who seriously opposed the murder of babies?
To: EternalVigilance
That would certainly remind me of another rebel army that fired on government troops and declared themselves in secession.
Of course that would be Lexington and Concord and the rebel army of 1775. Maybe not what you were looking for.
276 posted on
12/21/2015 3:06:09 PM PST by
Pelham
(Muslim immigration...the enemy is inside the wire.)
To: EternalVigilance
277 posted on
12/21/2015 3:13:23 PM PST by
Pelham
(Muslim immigration...the enemy is inside the wire.)
To: EternalVigilance
Aside from the question of who exactly it was in 1861 that called up an army and commenced hostilities first, how would you feel if today the abortion-minded decided to secede, and raise a rebel army, and fire at federal troops, because they thought their particular bloody trade was threatened by the election of a candidate who seriously opposed the murder of babies?That would be the North trying to secede in your example.
288 posted on
12/21/2015 4:43:40 PM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson