If you do not care to read the articles that is your choice.
First you poo-pooed the Times article, and now the National Review article. One on the left, one on the right.
It is clear you are not open to documented facts, as each source is dismissed by you.
It’s interesting to watch people wedded to their preconceptions withstand both left and right leaning sources. It’s more interesting when they asked to be presented with these sources, are presented with them, and then discount them.
We will continue to disagree and the data will continue to be as it is.
You’re wrong again.
I did read the LaTimes article.
You still haven’t specified what any of the facts are.
You are the one who made the claim, so it’s up to you.