Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sten
...since the universe is so vast, there MUST be life elsewhere.

The second clause does not logically follow the first.

16 posted on 02/02/2016 3:50:10 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: ShadowAce

If there is no life elsewhere in the Universe, then it’s just a big waste of real estate.


17 posted on 02/02/2016 4:16:45 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

True. That is because the phrase is really a shorthand version of the Drake “Equation” which, in turn, is itself just a very high level approximation of an equation human beings don’t even know all the terms for at present.

Properly, it should be:

The Universe is so vast ... there MUST be life elsewhere.”

The “...” representing, of course, all the various circumstances necessary for life (however you care to define it) to develop.

This, in itself, is a far less stringent condition for success than requiring the development of a spacefaring civilization in our galaxy and its explorers reaching the Earth during a time when mankind exists and is sufficiently advanced in its own right to properly evaluate their arrival. That achievement, to start out with, requires the development of life (and its elaboration) in at least TWO places vice one.


37 posted on 02/02/2016 5:21:57 AM PST by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson