Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/03/2016 5:41:00 AM PST by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: rickmichaels
For instance, more than 440,000 people would have to be working together to fool the public if climate change deniers are correct.

Strawman on two levels.

The email release a few years back shows AGW proponents ARE working together to suppress skeptics. And it doesn't take a conspiracy - a shared belief system is more than sufficient.

2 posted on 02/03/2016 5:43:55 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

I have said many times that conspiracy theorists give way too much credit to our government. Keeping a faked moon landing secret would require the complicit silence of thousands of NASA employees. Our government is simply not that competent.


3 posted on 02/03/2016 5:44:42 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

And how many would be involved to fake the Holocaust?

(it wasn’t faked)


4 posted on 02/03/2016 5:47:56 AM PST by DonkeyBonker (The future does not belong to Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Climate change has already been proven to be nothing but a scheme to transfer the wealth of first world nations to turd world kleptocracies.


6 posted on 02/03/2016 5:53:33 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

JFK. Maybe jackie o tapes will tell the story


7 posted on 02/03/2016 5:54:40 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels
For instance, more than 440,000 people would have to be working together to fool the public if climate change deniers are correct.

Just had to throw that one in there didn't they? But, I suspect that's what the entire article was building up to anyway.

And besides, the whole GW thing isn't a conspiracy, it's a religion. A much different animal for True Believers.

8 posted on 02/03/2016 5:54:54 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Why do we give our hearts to the past? And why must we grow up so fast?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

My grandmother thought the moon landing was fake. She was also convinced that rasslin’ was real.


10 posted on 02/03/2016 6:10:46 AM PST by Gamecock ( Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul...Matthew 10:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Science doesn’t say anything. Headline writers say things. An individual researcher may say something. “Science says” is a good example of the fallacious argument from authority.


12 posted on 02/03/2016 6:19:42 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Are Climate Change advocates also Global Warming Deniers? After all, only one of those theories finds support from frigid winter polar vortexes. Perhaps people who reason face a vast conspiracy of the indoctrinated.

Speaking of vast conspiracies, does the author consider the “science” of Hillary’s “vast right-wing conspiracy?”


15 posted on 02/03/2016 6:27:16 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Flight 800 comes to mind; a US Navy vessel shooting it down was one of those conspiracy theories. But could 200-300 sailors all be kept quiet, for that long a time? I think not.

But the possibility of a Muslim-manned small craft armed with a MANPAD or small SAM unit was pooh-poohed from the get go.


17 posted on 02/03/2016 6:33:44 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

JFK was anti-communist. He was killed by a communist.

I don’t see the need for a vast American conspiracy here. One might reasonably wonder if Castro or Moscow were involved.

I can see how the left would like to concoct domestic conspiracy theories rather than face the fact that an American President was murdered by a communist during the height of the cold war.


18 posted on 02/03/2016 6:36:28 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Fear by using the ability to “disappear” your family and friends is a very strong motivator to keep your mouth shut. Even on your deathbed.

Combined with the ability of 24/7 modern surveillance, it is practically foolproof. No sane individual would go against such a system.

North Korea is a prime example. Say anything against the insane “dear leader” and you’ll watch your family turned into dog food. For 3 generations they have stayed in power with no assassinations...


19 posted on 02/03/2016 6:39:34 AM PST by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

6 people (if my memory serves correctly) knew about Watergate, and they couldn’t even keep that one secret.


22 posted on 02/03/2016 6:40:32 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

“440,000 people would have to be working together “

I guess they never heard of “bias”.

On the flip side, how are the “deniers” managing to work together when the brilliant “scientists” can’t seem to pull it off?


24 posted on 02/03/2016 6:45:09 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

If NASA faked the moon landing, by now they would have faked something better. ;-)


25 posted on 02/03/2016 6:46:01 AM PST by r_barton (We the People of the United States...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Just because the truth is exposed doesn’t mean that the conspiracy will be undone. Consider BO’s fake birth certificate, TWA 800, muslim participation in the OKC bombing, etc. The US government routinely lies, denies truth, and does it with media complicity. Look, if the Allies in WWII could convince Hilter that the invasion would not happen at Normandy, what deceptions can be brought on American citizens?


31 posted on 02/03/2016 6:54:13 AM PST by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

the AGW ‘conspiracy’ isn’t a conspiracy per se, it is more a groupthink situation. the story is telling, and loses credibility by the ‘conspiracies’ it picks to illustrate it’s point, and which it ignores. perhaps the biggest is the JFK, which isn’t even mentioned.


34 posted on 02/03/2016 7:01:44 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

The National Reconnaissance Office that controls the nations spy satellites was kept a pretty good secret for about 40 years. There were rumors of the existence of military spy satellites, but not so much of a giant civilian government organization that managed them.


35 posted on 02/03/2016 7:02:54 AM PST by r_barton (We the People of the United States...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Evil government, “Tomorrow you will spray this deadly poison chemtrail over Springfield.”

Pilot, “My family reunion is in Springfield tomorrow.”

EG, “Just do it.”

P, “Yes sir.”


36 posted on 02/03/2016 7:17:20 AM PST by eartrumpet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Would that be the same “science” that pushes AGW?


37 posted on 02/03/2016 7:45:18 AM PST by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson