Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36
-- Perhaps the "he didn't go through a naturalization process" argument can be shown for the BS it is. --

The argument shifts to the difference between "at birth" (in the statute) and "after birth" (in FAM), with the summary conclusion being that nobody made citizen by operation of a statute that recites "at birth" is naturalized. The argument also rings of "They are made NBC pursuant to the founders leaving it to Congress to define NBC."

There is an unlimited supply of people hidebound to their conclusion, and it is literally impossible to shift them. Even a SCOTUS ruling against them, with Cruz as a party, would be met with disagreement.

216 posted on 02/07/2016 5:43:18 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
The argument shifts...

I may be a "Birther", but I see a bunch of "Pretzels"...they're all twisted up.

238 posted on 02/07/2016 5:16:34 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson