There is nothing personal in my post — toward you or toward Trump. I understand you believe in him, and that is not a reflection on you or your character.
You mentioned the principles (or qualities) that you see in Trump, and I responded with my opinion of the degree to which those principles apply to Trump. Nothing I posted was a personal attack on Trump, but either citation of facts about those qualities or my opinion of them.
His openly declared statement that everything is negotiable and his position even on immigration “is changing” is factual; pointing it out is neither a personal attack nor hostile. The statements about Trump University — renamed Trump Entrepreneurial Institute — were factual statements, borne out by the stories of its former students and the fact that it shut down operations in Texas rather than incorporate any changes required to comply with state law. Pointing those facts out is neither a personal attack nor hostile.
I recognize that I am unlikely to change your mind about Trump, and that is not my intention; but I will offer my opinions, backed up with facts as I can, as to why I believe he is not the right man for the job. At this point, the ONLY candidate that I trust with the issue of selecting federal and supreme court judges — IMO the SINGLE MOST CRITICAL ISSUE facing the country in this election — is Ted Cruz.
You left out the womanizing with married women, which he has also proudly admitted. Confidence is one thing, vanity and pride in evil behavior is another.