To: xzins
I’m pretty sure they prepared questions for all of the candidates.
And there is no evidence that Romney was present at Fox News production meetings. And if he was, so what?
You do realize Romney is not a candidate, right?
You are mad that Fox News didn’t genuflect to your candidate. That doesn’t make it unethical for them to prepare tough questions for him.
To: SoothingDave
I will guess we are talking about the obsolete definition of debate here? de·bate (dĭ-bāt′) v. de·bat·ed, de·bat·ing, de·bates v.intr. 1. To consider something; deliberate. 2. To engage in argument by discussing opposing points. 3. To engage in a formal discussion or argument. See Synonyms at discuss. 4. Obsolete To fight or quarrel. v.tr. 1. To deliberate on; consider. 2. To dispute or argue about. 3. To discuss or argue (a question, for example) formally. 4. Obsolete To fight or argue for or over. n. 1. A discussion involving opposing points; an argument. 2. Deliberation; consideration: passed the motion with little debate. 3. A formal contest of argumentation in which two opposing teams defend and attack a given proposition. 4. Obsolete Conflict; strife.
118 posted on
03/04/2016 12:41:57 PM PST by
Duchess47
("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
To: SoothingDave
So, you think partisan attacks from fake neutral moderators is ethical?
119 posted on
03/04/2016 1:52:12 PM PST by
xzins
(Do You Donate to the Freepathon? It's time to take YOUR turn!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson