[kiryandil]

In post #106, you wrote: "You’re wrong on the timeline. They had not been shot at yet at the point where they were asking the officers to identify themselves."

When I called you on your lie, your tune changed: "A state trooper fired one nonlethal round at the first traffic stop."

Why are you lying about this incident? Why are you trying to sell some cock-and-bull story?

Uncle Sham & Delta 21 - this guy RightFighter is selling bogus information for some reason. Take that into account when exchanging posts with "it"...

[Delta 21]

Confirming “Jack Boot Licker” status on RightFighter.

Plz advise if’n I’m mistaken.

[UCANSEE2]

this guy RightFighter is selling bogus information for some reason.

HOLD IT.

Rightfighter has been laying out his side of the argument (which is the police procedure and practice and the results of violating it) and has been sticking with facts. He gets one fact wrong and even admits it when called on it.

I respect that when an opponent in a debate does that. Heck, I have made several and no one (except for Rightfighter) called me on it when I referred to there being 9 shots instead of 3.

But that is how I learn, how human beings learn, is from mistakes.

I am enjoying the debate Rightfighter and I are having because we are exchanging info and trying to sort out the facts. Many others are two. May we all end up with twice the info to base our understanding of this incident on.

Don't get mad at Rightfighter because he takes the opposing side in this debate. What would a debate be without an opponent ?

Don't be so quick to infer people are trolls , please.