you might attempt to explain, why on the same date, BHO changed the name he had written down for his wife, and 27 days after the birth of 'his son' the boy didn't get a mention.
And now it's several years later, and he still didn't name a child - much of the information on that form IS WRITTEN IN ANOTHER HAND.
All of which might make one ask, just how genuine is that WOODS MEMO? The handwriting appears similar on both.
And now in April 1964 the wife from whom he is separated IS IN THE PHILIPPINES...imo it's all such a mess there is no way you can use the information from that file to establish just who he might have been married to, or if he had a son born in August 1964.
Conspiracy theorists can always find the latest supposed conspiracies but while being fun to debate on the Internet, they have zero relevance to the real world of jurisprudence.
If there was a chance of identity theft or document forgery both Congress and a prosecuting attorney in some jurisdiction in this nation would have held hearings and convened a grand jury, subpoenaed documents and witnesses and taken depositions under oath; none of that ever happened.
Comparing William Woods’ handwriting to other memos and documents that he wrote while working at the INS shouldn’t be difficult to accomplish.
I would think that the 1964 Dunham-Obama divorce decree which names Barack Hussein Obama, II as the only child of that marriage would suffice.
The marriage is also listed in Hawaii Index of Public Martiages 1960-1964.