Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
Donald Trump cynically took the low road to gain advantage in the primary process but it is not Trump evidently who is to be condemned but the messengers who indict him. Why is it right for Trump to gain votes by taking the low road but wrong for Cruz to expose Trump to gain back some of those primary votes?


36 posted on 03/13/2016 6:11:13 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

Sorry, but Cruz should have simply condemned the protestors. We are supposed to stand together against that kind of crap, not exploit it for cynical political advantage.


39 posted on 03/13/2016 6:12:30 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

“Listen, we all know that Donald has some bombastic rallies and is not responsible for every attendee at his large rallies. But there is absolutely no excuse for the Left to interfere with First Amendment political speech”.
A response somewhat along the lines of how he responded to the question about Detroit during the last debate would have been appropriate.
He is capable of doing it, but he chose not to.
So now it appears that you have to defend his decision because you support him; or it is because you agree with his sentiment.


62 posted on 03/13/2016 6:24:49 AM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

Ted has allied himself with BLM and Bill Ayers. Never thought I would see it. Truth is a relative thing to Lying Lawyer Ted.


76 posted on 03/13/2016 6:31:21 AM PDT by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson