I'd vote for a PANDA before Hillary!!
Posted on 03/29/2016 2:51:22 AM PDT by IBD editorial writer
Media Bias: The Washington Post led its Monday paper with a story titled “How Clinton’s Email Scandal Took Root.” What it revealed was that, left to the mainstream press, the story might never have hit the ground.
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
“Biased Press” is a term that just doesn’t have the impact it should. “Anti American Press” does them more justice.
Exactly right.
You spelled it wrong. It is spelled P R O P A N D A.
It is spelled P R O P A N D A
That made me giggle a lot.
The FR spelling police are going to make you repent.
Anyone got a panda pic ? :)
Clinton TOP SECRET Documents: How Democrat Activists Posing As Journalists Suppress The Truth
What is black and white and plays in the NFL? Propanda.
So....Hillary is running on the P A N D A platform??
I'd vote for a PANDA before Hillary!!
Also....sooner DATE the panda than truck with Hillary!
You mean like Fast & Furious, IRS targeting of demoKKKrat’s political opponents, widespread use of private communications and covert meetings to bypass transparency rules, as well as avoiding the many policy failures of this administration?
For any interested in this issue, the commentary in the linked article is worth a look, and the related WaPo story is essential reading. The first sentence makes the false claim that Hillary’s email trouble started after she was SoS (whereas problematic email traffic began prior to her start date) and WaPo presents several other falsehoods, plus “facts” based only on Hillary’s claims. But the overall fabric of the article is damning. No one with any sense at all could read this and think Hillary is anything but guilty as hell.
They discuss, but underplay the seriousness of, Hillary’s Blackberry problem, which will hang her for informed, deliberate, gross, reckless misconduct. The Blackberry was much more vulnerable to hacking and espionage than the private server — she knew it and continued using it.
As an optimist, I’d like to think WaPo understands the mountain of evidence against Hillary, and expects an indictment. This article, along with recent L.A. Times coverage, reads like they have decided to prepare the faithful, most of whom have never heard the facts or summarily dismissed them. (I had dinner with some elderly lefties on Easter. All their “news” comes from leftist media. They completely believe the email issue was made up by Republicans as dirty tricks. This WaPo article will be the first glimpse many people like them might see — though many will dismiss it and put their heads back in the sand).
WaPo did not do much to examine WHY Hillary wanted her communications to be hidden from legally mandated requirements. Or the Clinton Foundation connections.
Or why exactly Hillary put Bryan Pagliano on the public payroll at DoS, if she paid him to work on her private server as a side job, and no one at DoS supervised his work at DoS. What exactly did he DO? Hmm...
It’s worth saying and repeating that Hillary’s email troubles actually started with a hacker– Guccifier– who also bedeviled Bush and Colin Powell, among others.
However you slice it, and the last thing I expect is justice, this is seriously bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.