Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Objective Scrutator

So here’s what I was wondering about:

Given that no one likes or wants the choke hold we feel wrt current gov’t corruption, and no one wants violent revolution to restore our country back to its cherished foundations; how would you evaluate the effectiveness of 100% of the population utilizing the welfare system as a “restorative tool”?

Am I wrong to speculate that the system would collapse given the absence of producers? I wonder what would the rulers would do the?

I also thought that we don’t really have to do anything because it will collapse on its own, eventually.

What do ya’ll think?


22 posted on 04/06/2016 5:27:40 PM PDT by Right-wing Librarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Right-wing Librarian

I’m actually not sure whether or not the Leftists are so deluded they would try to have 100% of the population subsisting on welfare, or if they are evil and would try to enslave productive people in the interests of appealing to the low-IQ masses (similar to the plot in Atlas Shrugged). The former situation would obviously lead to a collapse in the system, while the latter situation could potentially subsist forever depending on technology and the ability of the intelligent to organize.

I do know that we need to stop the Leftists from getting anywhere near creating either of these dystopias, and that we should be willing to do so by any means necessary.


29 posted on 04/06/2016 5:56:15 PM PDT by Objective Scrutator (All liberals are criminals, and all criminals are liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson