Posted on 04/15/2016 5:25:44 AM PDT by simpson96
I don’t think she’s smart enough to come up with an idea like that.
Attention addict. An 8-month-old is thoroughly predictable in his feeding schedule, so it’s highly unlikely that he had to nurse right then. And he will be fine with the covering up if he has been used to it from the beginning.
Also, the headline is misleading.
Lol @ the peeing in public! You’re right.
I’m pregnant and will have my baby two weeks from today (scheduled induction) so soon I’ll be breast feeding. However, I will cover myself if/when I have to feed in public both for my sake, my husband’s sake, and the sake of the general public. Modesty seems lost in our stupid, libtard, progressivist society.
I realize BF’ing is natural, but no one needs to see my boobs. Those are private property.
In modern times,in civilized societies, the norm has been toward modesty.
Defecation is a perfectly normal bodily function, as is lactation, but we would hope that others would not force us to witness said function.
Hey maybe, at that point in time when she was in the courtromm, she self identified as a baby bottle. Who are we to judge? /s
The child should have been fed prior to going into the court room. I’ve never seen a court room that allowed food and eating of anything within it’s walls. Outside in the halls eating is usually alright but, not within the court room itself.
+1
Well said! Good point.
“No Jugstice, No Peace!”
As it happens NYC is indeed very Blasio about people peeing or crapping in public.
It's 'privileged' to exhibit self-restraint now, you know. Not to mention personal hygiene.
she has a lawyer
Like I said... :-)
Best answer yet! Blessings to you and the soon-to-arrive little one!
Babies happily defecate in courtrooms as well.
How selfish do you have to be to begrudge an infant eating?
In many cases the baby doesn’t cooperate. Covers get thrown off. There is no convenient exit. You either listen to the kid scream or feed him. I would rather look in a different direction than inconvenience the kid and my ears.
My wife has with three children. No one ever knew she was nursing.
She's in court, can't leave, baby wants to be fed.
Right... and... that explains why she needs to "bare it" instead of being discreet and modest... HOW, again?
[paladinan]
The same argument applies, doesnt it? Hey, whats even remotely sexual about peeing? You have an issue with a bare penis? Get over it, you pervert! Its natural, and its horribly selfish of you to require men to hold their pee until they get to some sort of interior urinal!
[dragonblustar]
That doesn't even compare. All that shows is your immaturity or sexual issues.
Ah, of course... the ever-winning mix of "special pleading fallacy" and ad hominem insults. If you'd like to have a civil discussion about this, fine; if you just want to flame, talk to the wall.
She's in court and has to keep that baby quiet.
Up to a point, yes (though that issue has already been addressed, c.f. babysitter, feeding the baby before going in, etc.).
If the baby was bottle fed, there wouldn't be an issue but because he's breast fed, people act like idiots.
Hey... don't let me interrupt your mature use of insults for those who disagree with you! :)
But seriously... you seem to have missed the main point, in favor of your pet red-herring: I'm not objecting to public breast-feeding. I'm not. Honest. Read that? NOT. N.O.T.
I object to the approach of some women (who apparently have your support, in this matter) who think nothing of "whipping it out" and showing her bare breast for the world to see, with a militant sort of devil-may-care attitude which throws modesty (what is that, again?) to the winds. See the distinction?
I doubt it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.