Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: paladinan
Stephanie Rhodus was in court on Monday to testify in a custody hearing for her 8-year-old son. She was waiting to be called to the stand when her younger son, 8-month-old Archer, wanted to be fed.

She's in court, can't leave, baby wants to be fed.

The same argument applies, doesn’t it? “Hey, what’s even remotely sexual about peeing? You have an issue with a bare penis? Get over it, you pervert! It’s natural, and it’s horribly selfish of you to require men to hold their pee until they get to some sort of “interior” urinal!”

That doesn't even compare. All that shows is your immaturity or sexual issues. She's in court and has to keep that baby quiet. If the baby was bottle fed, there wouldn't be an issue but because he's breast fed, people act like idiots.

35 posted on 04/15/2016 7:02:12 AM PDT by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: dragonblustar
Stephanie Rhodus was in court on Monday to testify in a custody hearing for her 8-year-old son. She was waiting to be called to the stand when her younger son, 8-month-old Archer, wanted to be fed.

She's in court, can't leave, baby wants to be fed.

Right... and... that explains why she needs to "bare it" instead of being discreet and modest... HOW, again?

[paladinan]
The same argument applies, doesn’t it? “Hey, what’s even remotely sexual about peeing? You have an issue with a bare penis? Get over it, you pervert! It’s natural, and it’s horribly selfish of you to require men to hold their pee until they get to some sort of “interior” urinal!”

[dragonblustar]
That doesn't even compare. All that shows is your immaturity or sexual issues.

Ah, of course... the ever-winning mix of "special pleading fallacy" and ad hominem insults. If you'd like to have a civil discussion about this, fine; if you just want to flame, talk to the wall.

She's in court and has to keep that baby quiet.

Up to a point, yes (though that issue has already been addressed, c.f. babysitter, feeding the baby before going in, etc.).

If the baby was bottle fed, there wouldn't be an issue but because he's breast fed, people act like idiots.

Hey... don't let me interrupt your mature use of insults for those who disagree with you! :)

But seriously... you seem to have missed the main point, in favor of your pet red-herring: I'm not objecting to public breast-feeding. I'm not. Honest. Read that? NOT. N.O.T.

I object to the approach of some women (who apparently have your support, in this matter) who think nothing of "whipping it out" and showing her bare breast for the world to see, with a militant sort of devil-may-care attitude which throws modesty (what is that, again?) to the winds. See the distinction?

59 posted on 04/15/2016 9:36:45 AM PDT by paladinan (Rule #1: There is a God. Rule #2: It isn't you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: dragonblustar
The baby is eight months old. Plenty of time for her to have conditioned the baby to take a bottle, a bottle of breast milk, or - GASP! - a pacifier! so she could actually take responsibility for the products of her lust and testify on behalf of her older child.

Sounds like she secretly wanted to fail so her mother would have to continue taking care of her earlier "oops."

72 posted on 04/15/2016 2:41:44 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson