Interesting, but horribly misguided!
This treatise is not about science, it is about statistics.
Actual science deals with physical reality and mathematics. Statistics can be very misleading. The average of 1 and 3 is 2. The problem is there is NO 2 in the sample.
You overlook the fact that all experimental (and observational) science, even particle physics, uses statistics as a filter — of course unlike the social sciences where being 1.96 standard deviations away from the means is “enough”, particle physicists want 5 standard deviations. And remember, experimental (and observational) science is supposed to be the reality check for scientific theories — if you’re not matching experiments or observations from the real world, you’re working in my area, mathematics, not one of the sciences (whether natural or social) properly so called.