Posted on 04/23/2016 5:20:04 AM PDT by Kaslin
Despite his big win in New York on Tuesday, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has had a pretty bad week. But will it matter? It should -- and just might.
During an NBC "Today" show town hall Thursday, the host read a question from Twitter concerning Trump's views on LGBT issues and how he plans to be inclusive as president. "Speak about North Carolina bathroom law in particular."
Trump responded: "I had a feeling that question was going to come up, I will tell you. Well, look, North Carolina did something that was very strong, and they're paying a big price, and there's a lot of problems. ... North Carolina, what they're going through, with all of the business that's leaving and all of the strife -- and that's on both sides -- you leave it the way it is. There have been very few complaints the way it is. People go, they use the bathroom that they feel is appropriate. There has been so little trouble."
In response to a follow-up question, Trump said he would not support putting new bathrooms in Trump Tower. "I think that would be discriminatory in a certain way."
These politically correct answers from the alleged king of political incorrectness have to be music to the ears of Democrats -- not only those far left enough to agree with Trump's view but all others because they know this will alienate Trump from the tons of Republican voters who recognize such lunacy. Perhaps Trump should have been more forthcoming about his true New York liberal values.
Before you buy into Trump's inevitable walk-back of this disaster, remember how he began his answer: that he had anticipated the question. I'm not sure whether that should be more damning than if his answer had been purely spontaneous, revealing his true feelings apart from political calculation, but it's greatly troubling either way.
Trump says he is concerned about the strife and "the economic punishment (North Carolina is) taking." But it seems he also sees the issue from the perspective of adult men who want to use little girls' bathrooms. Has he even considered this from the perspective of the parents of these girls and all other sane people who don't feel comfortable sharing bathrooms with people of the opposite gender?
Who thinks like this, other than a candidate pandering to new constituencies? Who actually believes that prohibiting grown men from using little girls' bathrooms is discriminatory against the transgender community rather than against the 99 percent of people who have always had the comfort of going to public restrooms without the fear that people of the opposite gender could invade their privacy? Isn't protecting public safety one of government's chief duties?
It will be interesting to see how Trump's infinitely forgiving fans explain this one away or whether they'll even bother to try. I get it; all they think about is unfair trade and "the wall," so maybe they'll explain why Trump wants to tear down public bathroom walls.
Also on Thursday, Trump said he would support raising taxes on the rich, which should concern all economic conservatives who support reducing taxes across the board to stimulate robust economic growth. It should also concern Trump's defenders who believed he was standing by the tax plan posted on his website, which includes a cut to the top rate, from 39.6 percent to 25 percent.
Those convinced that Trump has few ideological moorings and an inclination toward liberal positions are vindicated -- again. No matter what written plans Trump has proposed for use in his campaign, his instincts are to support the liberal position on many issues. And for those who buy that he's made a strong conversion from his previous liberal ways, you should know that there has apparently been no change in Trump's views about taxes since 1991, when he testified as a Democratic expert witness and described Ronald Reagan's tax cuts as "catastrophic."
Those who still believe in the sincerity of Trump's conversion to conservatism should be aware of the other bombshell that exploded this week in Camp Trump, which may be the most troubling of all.
In a private meeting aimed at reassuring concerned GOP leaders about Trump's positions and electability in a general election, Trump's "chief lieutenants" reportedly told them that Trump has been "projecting an image" up to this point in the primary season and "the part that he's been playing is evolving" in a way that will make him more palatable to general election voters. How utterly comforting.
Trump's new campaign guru, Paul Manafort, reportedly told Republican National Committee members that Trump has two personalities -- a private one and another one when he's onstage. "When he's out on the stage, when he's talking about the kinds of things he's talking about on the stump, he's projecting an image that's for that purpose. You'll start to see more depth of the person, the real person. You'll see a real different guy."
So his own campaign chief just comes right out and says Trump has been playing a role -- pretending to be someone he's not? This is just incredible stuff, folks.
For the life of me, I don't understand how Trump's most ardent supporters can feel comfortable relying on his always-shifting promises -- even on immigration. Those who still feel comfortable about his candidacy baffle me.
Yes, Trump won his liberal home state resoundingly, but looking back, this could be one of his worst weeks of the campaign.
Next thing he’ll build is the border Wall financed by ....here it comes.....Mexico
I think that’s exactly right.
It’s very clear that this crew wasn’t nearly as inspired to challenge Obama. Lucky for us, they’re inept and ineffective against Trump, too.
This reckoning was a long time coming. Self identified conservatives haven’t delivered on much. Increasingly important, voters are coming to the perfectly reasonable conclusion that Republicans are (another) major obstacle to advancing conservative goals. If we’re going to lose anyway, why keep enabling these asshats?
Well, yeah. And if being a “conservative” means that you don’t enforce the border, enter wars you have no intention of winning, allow our enemies to walk into our country without even naming them, then count me out.
Exactly. Retire these guys and look to building something better even if it takes 50 or 100 years.
Trump just recently reiterated that he is for raising taxes on the “rich” (a typical leftist Democrat mantra), including himself, natch (he was no doubt channeling Warren Buffet there...if Buffet was dead, that is).
Sooo...why has Donald Trump been under an ongoing IRS audit for around the past twelve years (by his own words and admission)? Isn’t anybody on that Trump Train even a little bit curious? (rhetorical question, of course)
Stop arguing by ex cathedra pronouncements and smell the coffee, as they say.
It is not that our foes have any real understanding of what they have wrought, or of what they seek. But like thoroughly conditioned robots, they proceed on a sense of mission. Trump absolutely nails it, when he comments on the "stupidity" of our policy makers & negotiators. Let's keep the momentum building; let us yet snatch victory from what has been planned for us by theorists who have all the reason of the academics Gulliver found on the island of Laputa.
I gave you my reasons. Maybe you should ask the approximately 70% of our fellow FReepers why they're on the same side as I am.
Uh huh. keep selling yourself a bag a crap. just like odummbo but white.
David Limbaugh who I actually like is stuck in denial.
And your denials do not amount to any more than smoke. I have more reason to believe Trump will do something right than I do Cruz, who had years to do anything right, and voted for Corker, TPP, and made no alliances to shut down anything.
What you quoted is pretty good, I can’t wait to hear how discriminatory the lefties consider that wording to be. Used to be immigrants had sponsors.
So your decision is based on faith?
Oh, I agree with you. But I am being realistic. Beating Hillary in 2016 won’t be easy. In fact, it’s unlikely. But Trump does give us the best chance, just because he will take the fight to Hillary and make her earn it.
A Rubio or Cruz would just stand there, repeating bullet points, and then pee themselves as they proceed to be certain losers in November.
I have a different mindset than many. I think we completely blew it in 2012, pretty much condemning us to a liberal-leftist status quo for much of the 21st century. It may very well be that the only plan we have now is to destroy the structure of the GOP and RNC and rebuild, and wait for the inevitable failure of the liberal elite society.
But until then, we have Trump. And those who will follow. Nothing to lose at this point. Go for it, and if we’re going to go down, go down with guns blazing. #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
Here is my suggestion for how Trump can start overcoming his negatives. It is a tactic that I have applied a number of times on different issues—always with very good results.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3422096/posts
Is it his pro abortion stance that’s so strong? Pro homo? pro big gov’t bailouts like tarp? pro gov’t paid for healthcare? pro make-em-legal right away? pro hillary would make a great pres??
which ones ohioan, would you use as your stalwart conservative positions of your candidate in this court of law?
would love to hear you defend ANY of the above as “conservative”
GREAT idea!
What does that have to do with the half a million bribe to keep Carley’s manager’s mouth shut? You support those types of payoffs?
“It is also a big jump to conclude that Trump wants flocks of barely-disguised trannies crowding women’s restrooms, when he questioned why we are even discussing this. “
Coming to that conclusion would be a big jump. My gosh, I don’t believe Trump wants that! Never crossed my mind.
But during the interview, he shoots down a great solution of them having their own restrooms, saying it would cost businesses money. Businesses are going to lose money one way or the other with this anyway.
But then he explained that offering restrooms just for them would be discriminatory (disappointing PC nonsense).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.