Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

What really gets me is where among scientists these things come out. Tyson aside, most physicists and chemists understand that the quantum mechanical universe makes no sense, so pulling definitive conclusions about experiments that have never been run is pretty much speculation. If you really want to see this stuff run wild, listen to neuroscientists. They think everything in a brain can be predetermined and free will is an illusion.

My two cents: it is hard for me to believe that they really believe this stuff and they are trying to set policy by pretending to have special insight that cannot exist. The result is that scientists appeal to an authority they do not have and expect the unwashed to be too impressed by their credentials to argue.


7 posted on 06/30/2016 1:49:06 PM PDT by organicchemist (Without the second amendment, the first amendment is just talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: organicchemist

I agree. A lot of people don’t realize that “science” is a procedure for uncovering information about the world, not a set of moral values.


10 posted on 06/30/2016 5:48:22 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("Estos sufrimientos pasaran, y la esperanza una salida marcara." ~ Abp. Romero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson