> The narrative certainly doesn’t add up. It was initially reported multiple shooters from “elevated” positions.
Probably from a grassy knoll. ;-)
________
Initial reports are just that, and you must know they are often very wrong.
Panic, shooting, blood, officers down, a thousand or more people on scene in a blind panic—please, do not expect accurate reports to make it to your TV set initially.
The ;-) meant that I wasn’t serious. As someone pointed out earlier, a large number of police were involved, and if there were good evidence that more than one shooter was involved, I believe that evidence would come out. The police wouldn’t stand for that information being suppressed. They’d want vengeance on everyone involved.