I agree with your point about the convention of the states. There’s nothing globalist, or anti-globalist for that matter, about the process. The process itself has no ideology. It’s value, pro or con, would be determined by the specific amendments set forth. It could have a positive effect if the right amendments were put forth. Most of the proposed amendments I’ve seen from proponents like Mark Levin are not globalist in nature.
The Globalists salivate at the prospect of a “Convention”, so they can, with their power, contaminate the process and put the final nails in the coffin of Free Men once and for all.
We won’t fall for that tactic. NO. No new Convention is needed or wanted. It is to be avoided at all costs. We recognize it as the ploy it is.
All that is needed is to actually enforce the existing Constitution, and deport or execute all traitors, as was done in the past. I trust DJT to work out all the specifics.