Posted on 07/13/2016 11:12:08 AM PDT by MarchonDC09122009
Combining Childhood Vaccines at One Visit Is Not Safe” published in the Journal of American Physicians Surgeons Volume 21, Number 2, Summer 2016.
http://www.jpands.org/vol21no2/miller.pdf
CDC’s VAERS Data Confirm Multiple Vaccines Given at Same Time Increase Morbidity and Mortality in Children
Medical research journalist Neil Z Miller on the publication of an apparent retrospective analysis of CDC VAERS data titled “Combining Childhood Vaccines at One Visit Is Not Safe” published in the Journal of American Physicians Surgeons Volume 21, Number 2, Summer 2016.
“Since 1990, the VAERS database has received more than 500,000 reports of suspected adverse reactions to vaccines.”
"Our study also calculated the case fatality ratio (mortality rate) among vaccinated infants, stratified by the number of vaccine doses they received. Of the 38,801 VAERS reports that we analyzed, 11,927 infants received one, two, three, or four vaccine doses prior to having an adverse event, and 423 of those infants died: a mortality rate of 3.6%. The remaining 26,874 infants received five, six, seven, or eight vaccine doses prior to the adverse event and 1,458 of them died: 5.4%. The mortality rate for infants who received five to eight vaccine doses (5.4%) is significantly higher than the mortality rate for infants who received one to four vaccine doses (3.6%), with a rate ratio (RR) of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.4-1.7). Of infants reported to VAERS, those who had received more vaccines had a statistically significant 50% higher mortality rate compared with those who had received fewer. [2]"
US childhood vaccine aggressive schedule causes unnecessary injury and mortality.
Period.
US is well advised to revise it's childhood vaccine schedule to adopt a more conservative approach using single doses at a later age, as practiced in European and Asian countries.
I think I need to run that by those guys with the vaccination guns at new soldier intake processing centers.
I agree with vaccinations but overloading them all at once = mistake.
Had to argue with our doctor about this. Thanks for posting. Will print out!
It makes sense !!!
How much can a body take, especially a small body?
Donald Trump was vilified in the MSM for his voicing concern about the aggressive US childhood vaccine causing injuring children.
It looks like he’s been vindicated by this latest study of CDC vaccine injury data...
Trump: I’m In Favor of Vaccines, But Dosage and Time Has Link to Autism
Did that with my kids
Pnewmomcocal at about 6 weeks.
Tdap at 3 months
Polio at 6 months
Second Tdap at a year
Polio and tdap followups at 18 months.
and any other followups the following year.
and nothing else.
All had chickenpox.
One had an MMR and reacted badly so no MMRs
Healthiest immune systems in the doc’s practice.
None ever needed an antibiotic before age 8 or 9.
One had an ear infection once that I treated with warm olive oil and heat.
So, our baby due for 6 month shots & we’ve been using the schedule provided by pediatrician, CDC. Now i’m questioning our decision. Schedule below seems like alot!
Any advice?
6 months
DTaP
Hib
PCV
RV: This third dose may be needed, depending on the brand of vaccine used in previous RV immunizations.
Flu
Hep B
IPV
Yup.
Kiddo and some of his peers in the service got very sick just after multiple vaccine doses in one med visit during bootcamp.
Some immunity systems can only take so much, as the vaccine safety sheets, Physician’s Desktop Reference guide, CDC VAERs, and National Vaccine Injury database indicate.
RE: “I think I need to run that by those guys with the vaccination guns at new soldier intake processing centers.”
see above
Just saw your post..thank you!
If they are admitting this much I guarantee it is much worse.
Even if vaccinations caused no harm to the body in themselves, it is still enormously stressful for little kids to receive 4 or 5 shots at the same time and then to have to repeat this until they have received the 26 or 28 or more doses now required.
I am not a physician.
However, I would no way in hell subject my infant child to a vaccine cocktail of multiple dosages so early in their immunological system’s developmemt.
We didn’t with our kids.
With current autism rates of between 1 in 33 to 66%, Millions of US parents are taking a more conservative approach, as they ought to in light of data such as the one cited in this study.
RE: “So, our baby due for 6 month shots & we’ve been using the schedule provided by pediatrician, CDC. Now i’m questioning our decision. Schedule below seems like alot!
Any advice?
6 months
DTaP
Hib
PCV
RV: This third dose may be needed, depending on the brand of vaccine used in previous RV immunizations.
Flu
Hep B
IPV”
Doctors don't know everything, but parents blindly follow their instructions. Be wary and question everything.
Our oldest child got chickenpox. Her pediatrician after diagnosing it said once over it, she will never have to worry about it again. So a year later, she got chickenpox... again, diagnosed by same pediatrician, who said "Huh!". Yup, you can get it again. That doctor was the chief pediatrician in SF and head of the SF Health Commission, the go-to guy. Even the experts don't know everything.
This thread will be a war zone in no time. I’m out!
“Doctors don’t know everything, but parents blindly follow their instructions. Be wary and question everything.”
Smoking is harmless, statins are ok, sexual deviancy is normal...I can go on...
So one of them wasn’t chickenpox. There are practitioners out there who have never seen measles chickenpox, cow pox and the others.
I am pretty sure my son (now 31) had chicken pox 3 times. He had a fairly mild case the first round, then two later rounds, which were very light, just a handful of blisters each time.
Have you ever stopped to consider they give a newborn infant the same size vaccine dose that they give a grown man/woman (some of whom weigh in at 300 lbs)? Same with dogs—big, small, it’s all the same dose. Makes a person wonder.
Note to FR moderator:
This post is current Frontpage news regarding ground breaking peer reviewed health study that concerns millions of children and parents each year.
Why has the front page designation been pulled?
The US MSM will not likely cover this.
FR helps ensure this study shows up in web search results.
Thanks
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.