Posted on 08/16/2016 1:44:10 PM PDT by BenLurkin
When did science become “correlation implies causation?”
Sigh.
Yeah, they must have missed my 1976 paper on the subject which I co-authored with Captain Obvious and N. O. Kidding of the Norwegian Ice Institute.
Adopt Agenda 21...or else....
Not about sea ice per se, but about climate change and sea levels.
Google great barrier reef and you will get nothing but panic. The reef is dying. Chlorine and acid are destroying our reef. What can be done???? CATASTROPHE!
Except, it has happened before. The reef was high and dry and dead (supposedly) thousands of years ago. How can that be? The reef we are so worried about was dead before. How is it that it exists today? HMMMMMMMM?
Excerpt from an article.
“Professor Webb said rising sea levels inundated the current continental shelf of Queensland after the end of the last great Ice Age (around 18,000 years ago).
“Before that, what is now the Great Barrier Reef was high and dry and consisted of a series of limestone tablelands complete with trees, grasses and soils,” he said.
“Our new samples allow us to see what coral communities first colonised those tablelands as they were inundated by the sea around 9,000 years ago.”
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-10-future-great-barrier-reef.html#jCp
There is nothing new under the sun
Ice responds to changes in temperature.
Who knew ???
And confiscating your guns.
Cause or effect? Leading, coincident, or lagging indicator?
If those “scientists” can’t document through personal on-site observation and scientific measurement of the sea ice 90,000 years ago, we’ll just have to assume that the data was just SWAG and not scientific at all.
Didn’t he provide a welcome relief from Houston’s summer heat?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.