When you're with the Flintstones you'll have a yabba dabba doo time a dabba doo time You'll have a gay old time.
I didn’t know they made SUV’s out of sea ice back then.
What? Climate has changed before? I thought that now was the only time the climate ever changed...I’m such a confused little snowflake.
Is this like the chicken or the egg question??
Sure. Whatever. By definition....
When you're with the Flintstones you'll have a yabba dabba doo time a dabba doo time You'll have a gay old time.
So, sea ice goes south during ice ages and retreats north during the warm cycles? Who knew? Good thing we have experts to find out stuff like this.
So the take away from this study is that ice melts when it’s warm and forms when it’s cold. Got it!
Unpossible.
When did science become “correlation implies causation?”
Sigh.
Not about sea ice per se, but about climate change and sea levels.
Google great barrier reef and you will get nothing but panic. The reef is dying. Chlorine and acid are destroying our reef. What can be done???? CATASTROPHE!
Except, it has happened before. The reef was high and dry and dead (supposedly) thousands of years ago. How can that be? The reef we are so worried about was dead before. How is it that it exists today? HMMMMMMMM?
Excerpt from an article.
“Professor Webb said rising sea levels inundated the current continental shelf of Queensland after the end of the last great Ice Age (around 18,000 years ago).
“Before that, what is now the Great Barrier Reef was high and dry and consisted of a series of limestone tablelands complete with trees, grasses and soils,” he said.
“Our new samples allow us to see what coral communities first colonised those tablelands as they were inundated by the sea around 9,000 years ago.”
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-10-future-great-barrier-reef.html#jCp
There is nothing new under the sun
Cause or effect? Leading, coincident, or lagging indicator?
If those “scientists” can’t document through personal on-site observation and scientific measurement of the sea ice 90,000 years ago, we’ll just have to assume that the data was just SWAG and not scientific at all.