Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fella

You can’t simply ‘engineer’ for a 500-1000 year event Who ever wrote the article is foolish to think ‘drainage improvements would have done any good.


7 posted on 08/21/2016 5:56:38 AM PDT by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

Why aren't Geraldo and Shemp Smith down there crying and yelling at Obama into cameras?

Why no Church discussions of a Weather Machine - and the rain being created by the U.S. Govt?


10 posted on 08/21/2016 6:02:12 AM PDT by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Godzilla
You can’t simply ‘engineer’ for a 500-1000 year event Who ever wrote the article is foolish to think ‘drainage improvements would have done any good.

That's not true in general. As the article notes, a "1000 year event" is an event which has a probability of occurring of .1% per year. Most disciplines of engineering prevent failures due to events with much lower probability than that.

The real issue, as you noted, is the difficulty and expense of building solutions to low probability events in civil engineering. It isn't hard to figure out how to prevent damage from a rarely occurring phenomenon, but it is hard to justify spending the money on the solution when everyone thinks it isn't likely to happen.

20 posted on 08/21/2016 7:33:32 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson