To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is a pretty old article to be posting today.
We still have some old Power PCs in our data center. They are white elephants. I don’t see any successor being more than a niche solution, Performance difference for most applications won’t be great, and support for the architecture has been less than stellar. Whether we like it or not, Intel’s architecture has so much support and benefits from the economies of scale, that I don’t see them being challenged in any realm other than small low power devices, which is ARM’s turf.
2 posted on
10/08/2016 11:20:23 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: ShadowAce; SunkenCiv; NormsRevenge; Marine_Uncle; TigersEye; blam; justa-hairyape; SierraWasp; ...
fyui
Take a break form the HOT USA election News!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Wow. 7 nm.
I remember the big lunkers on PCBs.
5 posted on
10/08/2016 11:45:02 AM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
To: Swordmaker; qam1
8 posted on
10/08/2016 12:06:49 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(We will be one People, under one God, saluting one American flag. --Donald Trump (standing ovation)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It’s R&D work. Won’t be in production for years.
10 posted on
10/08/2016 1:04:41 PM PDT by
Renkluaf
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
" The next node could possibly be at 4 nanometers, but no one is sure if this can be done in a way that is economically feasible. (The DNA in your cells is 2.5 nanometers wide, just to give you a sense of how small these circuits are getting.)" Man O Man.
I remember the good ole days of 1.5 - 1.0 microns.
12 posted on
10/08/2016 3:21:41 PM PDT by
blam
(Jeff Sessions For President)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson