Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man
> Before windows 95 windows 1, 2 and 3 were just gui shells overlaying the dos o/s.

Win95 and Win98 still were just GUI applications that ran over MS-DOS. They largely supplanted the MS-DOS underlayment with Windows equivalents, but it was still really a DOS app. WinME tried harder to hide that fact, and that's one of the things that made WinME such a dog.

It wasn't until Win2K (actually NT5) that an MS-DOS-less Windows was made available to the general public. (NT4 was a bit over the top for average users.)

And they still had to provide CMD.EXE because there are some things that a GUI just won't do.

36 posted on 10/23/2016 10:23:18 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored

I didnt think nt4 was too hard to use.


42 posted on 10/23/2016 10:34:53 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

On the Microsoft end of things, I started with MS-DOS 5. DOS 6 had a compression feature that I was adventurous enough to use. I was excited to get Windows 3 and at my job at the time they had the Workgroups version of Windows 3 and then Windows 95. I liked Windows NT, Windows XP and Windows 7. It seems to be hard for Microsoft to understand that some of us still use and need desktop computers and we don’t want the operating system to be like something you see on a phone or tablet.


46 posted on 10/23/2016 11:28:40 PM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson