BREAKING: FBI JUST RELEASED HILLARY’S EMAIL INVESTIGATION ONLINE

the gateway pundit ^ | 11/1/2016 | Jim Hoft

[conservativepoet]

The FBI released documents from their Clinton Email Investigation. From the FBI website: Hillary Rodham Clinton served as U.S. Secretary ...

[excopconservative]

We learn that “many discussions” were held on her server about nominating an individual for a drone strike. DOD, State, and CIA were involved in these discussions and there were often differences of opinion that required discussion. Was Obama not involved? He was not mentioned. (Part 2 of 4, page 3). Being killed as a result of an email discussion doesn’t seem right for some reason. To Hillary Clinton these discussions did not even warrant concern for how they were classified. Should deciding to kill someone be called secret, confidential, or just unclassified... gee, I don’t know. (Ibid, page 6).

[Boardwalk]

If I were Martha Stewart I would be pissed!

[hoosiermama]

BTTT

[Osage Orange]

Please...this is old news.

[LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget]

Obama

[Netz]

I want the Big Bomb already...(losing patience)

[combat_boots]

BTTT

[broken_arrow1]

Ping

[Candor7]

PING to Interesting stuff here Fred. We have the FBI responding to Hillary’s demand to release documents? The agnecy is now fighting back on a political scale? Something that the Obama -Clinton fascist did not expect? There may be shooting yet.

[b4its2late]

They’ll never get ahead of wiki.

[EBH]

The redacted name? Is that 0bama’s blackberry?

[fivecatsandadog]

[dmcnash]

The unspoken question here is “How did the SOS communicate with POTUS and how?” Seems as if no one wants to ask that question, probably because the answer is obvious.

[Right Wing Assault]

I wonder who "or ____" is?

[Steve Van Doorn]

Reading over the file. They don’t seem to make sure “intent” was in the report. The “oops” it was an accident argument could still be used.

[Whenifhow]

PING!!!

Article and comments, esp #60 and #28

#28 - image
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3487971/posts?page=28#28

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3487971/posts?page=60#60

*PING* to the post this is replying to. Source:https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-01-of-04/view (page 21).
But on page 20 there is also this:

(U/FOUO) When asked about the e-mail chain containing “(C)” portion markings that State determined to currently contain CONFIDENTIAL information, Clinton stated she did not know what the “(C)” meant at the beginning of the paragraphs and speculated it was referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical orderddd.392 Clinton identified a “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer (inserted in the document by the FBI prior to the interview) and asked if the “(C)” related to the “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer.393 Clinton did not believe the content fo the email was classified and questioned the classification determination.394 When asked of her knowledge regarding TOP SECRET, SECRET, and CONFIDENTIAL classification levels of USG information, Clinton responded that she did not pay attention to the “level” of classification and took all classified information seriously.395

C. (U/FOUO) Classified Information Found in Clinton’s E-mails on Personal Server Systems

(U/FOUO) FBI and USIC classification reviews identified 81 e-mail chains containing approximately 193 individudal e-mail exchangesccc that were classified from the CONFIDENTIAL to the TOP SECRET levels at the time the e-mails were drafted on UNCLASSIFIED systems and sent to or from Clinton’s personal server. Of the 81 e-mail chains classified at the time of transmittal, 68 remain classified. Tweleve of the e-amil chains, classified by State as SECRET or CONFIDENTIAL, were not among the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided to State and the FBI by Williams & Connoly. In addition to State Classified equities, the investigation determined the 81 e-mail chains contained classified equities from 5 other USIC agencies: the CIA, DOD, FBI, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), and National Security Agency (NSA).

thanks, grey_whiskers

[WildHighlander57]

Saving for later read...

[timestax]

[GregNH]

Hmmmm So in looking at the blocked out redaction's I see ⁱⁱⁱ in superscript at the first one and ^kkk at the second third one. Then I see ^jjj after the end of that sentence and before the beginning of the next sentence. Why?

And of course these are alphabetical so they are least up to "k" on a list of whatever....