A whole lot of connections that, well, misses one very important detail:
1) How does Susan Sandler know this handkerchief has a map on it to ‘pizza’ locations - the Realtor described it as being a black and white piece of cloth. Do you think she called the Realtor who then gave a detailed description of an object that has little value? Did she get the map information when she called the Realtor to arrange delivery of the pillows she purchased? If she did have that conversation, wouldn’t the message simply say ‘let me know if you want it’ as she’d tell the Realtor to include it with her pillows?
Again, far more likely that these are words inserted by someone fat fingering on a cell phone, forwarding a long string of conversation to see if someone lost a handkerchief.
If you’re going to quote occam’s razor, you really do have to apply it to the base question before you go off into making connections.
just the slightest amount of digging destroys the auto-correction / fatfinger argument.
To wit: ses@sandlerfoundation.org
as in
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32795
(”handkerchief,” “black and white,” “map,” “pizza”)
seems imho to be susan e sandler, who is obviously imho the daughter of herbert m sandler, or (imho)
as in GoldenEagles’s
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/30613
(”play dominoes” “cheese” “pasta”)
so this hopefully everyone with a room temperature IQ will agree, totally and absolutely forever demolishes the auto-correct / fatfinger hypothesis, because both Susan E Sandler and her father, Herbert M Sandler, are writing messages that contain pedophile code words to John Podesta.
—i submit to all that the auto-correct / fat finger “ockham’s razor” hypothesis is totally demolished. so everyone we can now leave this (along with those who cling to it— FR desperately needs an “ignore user” button— and come up with something else!! And hopefully those adherents know when to quit... :-)
PS, Mary Podesta is CC’d in
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/30613
so it seems, imho, she is in on the inside pedophile jokes too.
Or do people really want to argue with these equivalences
hms herbert m sandler
ses susan e sandler
mary.podesta mary podesta
also i note that the NYT tried to reach John Podesta for comments on pizzagate but received no response for the Nov. 21, 2016 article. Let me ask each and every one of you— if someone came to you and gave you a chance to be quoted in the NYT as having nothing to do with any alleged pedophile activity, would you not jump at the chance to proclaim your innocence far and wide forever for the world to read in the preeminent so-called newspaper of record? What is up with John Podesta that he won’t even go to bat for himself in what has to be one of the two most liberal friendly newspapers in the world? Only two choices come to my mind:
(a) John Podesta is really a nice guy, but just shy; or
(b) John Podesta is a creep, guilty as sin of something, and is operating like Bill Cosby under a code of silence imposed by his criminal lawyers.