Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: spokeshave; rusty millet; stormhill; sourcery; InterceptPoint; Dalberg-Acton

...potentially explosive...
...perhaps the greatest...
...if those investigating...
...is the possibility...
...Although widely believed...
...explanation remains unsubstantiated...
...are code for something...

The point I was making was that there was more “skitter” and sidestepping in that one paragraph than at a Hillary Clinton subcommittee interview. I didn’t consider anything in that paragraph to be absolute proof. Sorry for the lack of a sarcasm tag.


81 posted on 12/05/2016 5:08:21 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: moovova
Sorry for the lack of a sarcasm tag

Not needed IMHO. Your post was spot on.

82 posted on 12/05/2016 5:14:54 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson