So let me read between the lines here... In Clinton areas of Michigan, the technique to double count votes was to yank the ballot out of the electronic counting machine before it is fully read and then re-enter the ballot again (”Every time a jammed ballot was removed and reinserted, he suspects the machine may have re-counted it.”). This resulted in 87 machines getting jammed on election day in Detroit. Now that the judge-ordered recount is under way, these 610 precincts are unable to reconcile the electronic tally of votes cast with the number of paper ballots issued.. Michigan law says such precincts may not be recounted. In essence, Hillary can keep her initially garnered fraudulent votes, but no new fraudulent votes may be added to her tally in those precincts.
Of course, the fact I have to read about this in a UK newspaper is scandalous to the US media.
That’s the gist of it, XERHpa. And that’s why they really need to look into this. I’m certain that this happens every election, but this time, with the recount, the evidence gets displayed even if it can’t be used directly.
Although, they might have some leverage with it, to go after election officials in the precincts that are dealing with the issue.
Yep.