Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse

It’s not in earth orbit. Which you are well aware. It’s between Mars and Jupiter. I gave a reasonable cost structure based on FACTS. Do they same to support your viewpoint and we can continue this discussion


129 posted on 01/17/2017 9:37:05 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: from occupied ga
Again, you fail to take into account new technologies. You are very correct that if we used current solid/liquid heavy boosters to try to get first to orbit, and then out to the Belt... It'd be fantastically expensive and risky. I'm not debating that at all... In fact, I even posted two different links talking about cost/pound of getting things from ground to orbit and a comparison of existing boosters.

BUT... COMMA...

However, you are completely dismissing the promise of new technology that is now being tested both in labs on Earth and in orbit. Coupled with PRIVATE companies speculating on $2Q in potential returns? You'd have to be a complete Luddite lunatic to think they won't find a way...

DIY testers are currently building their own EM drive test rigs for around $10k. These units produce enough Newtons in thrust to out perform photon rockets and ion drives. Couple that with the fact that robotic mining probes aren't going to need a full science package like Cassini, won't have the fuel costs associated with other probes/missions, etc... The costs aren't nearly what you are portraying them as.

130 posted on 01/17/2017 11:29:40 AM PST by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson