In what way is it informative? In providing actual evidence that doesn't assume evolution? If you think the answer is "yes" then you saw something that wasn't there.
The absurdity of your argument here should be apparent to anybody who takes a minute to remember we are talking about something called "convergent evolution".
Of course, as the name says, its based on evolution, and it attempts to explain how distantly related populations can have similar features.
As such, it will make no sense to anybody who rejects evolution theory.