Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VIDEO: U.S. Navy Tests ‘Star Wars’ Electromagnetic Rail Gun That Can Destroy Targets up [tr]
Breitnart ^ | March 23, 2017 | Katherine Rogriguez

Posted on 03/24/2017 8:23:12 AM PDT by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: InterceptPoint

4500 mph? That’s only Mach 6. I once worked on missiles that were faster than that. I think someone got the wrong information.
__________________________________________________________

That is the “un-classified” speed. Research papers say 7000 MPH.

Yes at 125 miles the slug will be less speed than it left but not much. It will go through a “Lot” of concrete and kill a lot of people inside a concrete building. It will tear right through most armor because of the speed which is a force multiplier. There is no armored vehicle that can be protected from that kind of speed.

The speed is something like a hundred miles a minute. I would not want to be on the receiving end.


21 posted on 03/24/2017 9:30:36 AM PDT by JAKraig (my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

Naw. I’ve seen this before. The gov’t has apparently concluded that a giant slag of metal is cheaper than a missile.

You’re right that there are missiles way faster than this; this is WAY slower than orbital velocity. But I guess a hundred $10,000 slabs of metal can do way more damage at 4,500 MPH than one million-dollar missile. (I have no real idea how big the projectile is, I’m just throwing out numbers for example.)


22 posted on 03/24/2017 9:36:39 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

I think that’s considered a feature, not a bug in this case. If you spot ISIS operating out of a school, you can completely obliterate the fortified principal’s office, and leave the secretary’s office undamaged.


23 posted on 03/24/2017 9:42:19 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dangus

They need to be able to send out a swarm of these projectiles like buck shot out of a 12 gauge shotgun.


24 posted on 03/24/2017 10:17:41 AM PDT by Eleven Bravo 6 319thID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
U.S. Navy Tests ‘Star Wars’ Electromagnetic Rail Gun That Can Destroy Targets

Initial indications are that the Star Wars Rail Gun is not as effective at destroying Targets as transgendered who have to pee.


25 posted on 03/24/2017 10:20:09 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I think the idea would be to put the railgun slug through the Target restroom while the perverts are in there causing trouble ...


26 posted on 03/24/2017 10:24:34 AM PDT by NorthMountain (The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dangus

The projectile is a 25 pound piece of aluminum.
4500 mph is more than enough to do a lot of damage, but I’d more likely believe that the velocity is classified and not available to the public or reporters.
I worked on the control surfaces (fins) design of a missile that went about 2.5X faster than that. My biggest problem was creating a design where the stainless steel fins didn’t melt from air friction before the missile got to the target.


27 posted on 03/24/2017 10:32:22 AM PDT by BuffaloJack ("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig

Good Old 1/2 MV^2 to the rescue. That squaring of the velocity is a real “killer”.


28 posted on 03/24/2017 10:42:18 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

If it is already Mach 6 when it leaves the barrel, air resistance is not going to much of an issue for quite a while. After you get past about Mach 1.2, drag is reduced substantially, so the inertia of the projectile could carry it pretty far.


29 posted on 03/24/2017 11:11:25 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

Aluminum? That’s so much more expensive per pound than iron, I’m surprised there is no OTHER metal that’s also cheaper (but not magnetic?).


30 posted on 03/24/2017 11:22:34 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

... I guess not... looks like Aluminum is the cheapest stuff per pound out there,... only thing that comes close in zinc.


31 posted on 03/24/2017 11:28:17 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
I prefer a rocket launcher to a rail gun. You just have to lead your target but the splash damage makes of for changes in target trajectory.

Oh, we are honestly talking about real world tech? Someone please explain the ROI on this? Piercing capabilities at a greater distance in shorter time? How does is it really superior to standard ballistics and brute force compensation for missed shots. If this is starwars and we are talking about missile defense, you better perfect targeting. At least with lasers (theoretically) you can adjust targeting real time. The only thing left is anti-satellite applications.
32 posted on 03/24/2017 11:38:22 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

Well, it’ll be better than that. Depending on the trajectory, it would go miles in the air. And physics tells us (as do meteorite strikes) that whatever energy it had in the vertical direction going up, it will reclaim coming down (discounting air resistance). Depending on the shape and size of the projectile, the terminal velocity could be quite great - BIG impact.


33 posted on 03/24/2017 12:11:43 PM PDT by HeadOn (God is in control, not Obama, not Trump, not you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry

WWII battleships did it with great accuracy at 20 miles or better.

Yeah - this is a whole lot farther, but ballistic trajectories (parabolic) are still described by the same equations - just using bigger numbers, and I’m sure adjusting for the special considerations for the super-fast launch.

Bottom line? Hitting the target will not be a problem. Artillery men have been doing it for ages.


34 posted on 03/24/2017 12:17:12 PM PDT by HeadOn (God is in control, not Obama, not Trump, not you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Aluminum makes sense, 1/3rd the density of steel.
It’s light so that it can achieve higher velocity for the same energy. And the delivered impact energy is equal to the mass times the velocity squared.


35 posted on 03/24/2017 12:17:33 PM PDT by BuffaloJack ("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
U.S. Navy is testing

Do da name "development" ring a familiar note?

36 posted on 03/24/2017 12:18:27 PM PDT by MosesKnows (Love Many, Trust Few, and Always Paddle Your Own Canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

>> It’s light so that it can achieve higher velocity for the same energy. And the delivered impact energy is equal to the mass times the velocity squared. <<

A pound of feathers weights the same as a pound of bricks. If it has one third the weight when launched, so it goes three times faster, than it impacts with one third the mass. IOW, 3 * 1/3 = 1. But the pound of bricks hurts your foot more, because the denser object creates less wind resistance.


37 posted on 03/24/2017 12:36:10 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman; Zathras

Agreed! 4500 mph initial velocity and 15 degrees elevation yields about 125 mile range. That parabola is about 8.5 miles high.

Not much air resistance at that altitude... The troposphere only goes up 7 miles. That’s 90% of the air.

(Alan Shepard went up 116 miles - he was basically riding a ballistic missle.)


38 posted on 03/24/2017 12:40:52 PM PDT by HeadOn (God is in control, not Obama, not Trump, not you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus
Believe this first gen weapon shoots 10 rounds per minute.

One of the big issues with railgun technology is that the rails wore out quickly. How many shots will this one deliver before the gun rails need replacing?

39 posted on 03/24/2017 12:41:21 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

What weighs more? 25 pounds of aluminum or 25 pounds of feathers.


40 posted on 03/24/2017 2:55:20 PM PDT by HARRY TUTTLE (Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more. You should never wish to do less. R. E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson