Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

4500 mph? That’s only Mach 6.
I once worked on missiles that were faster than that.
I think someone got the wrong information.


2 posted on 03/24/2017 8:26:59 AM PDT by BuffaloJack ("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BuffaloJack
4500 mph? That’s only Mach 6. I once worked on missiles that were faster than that. I think someone got the wrong information.

You could be right but I doubt it. The nice thing about this weapon compared to a missile is that the bullets are pretty cheap. Compared to a missile. Getting hit by a chunk of stuff coming at you at 4500 MPH would really hurt.

3 posted on 03/24/2017 8:31:46 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BuffaloJack

Naw. I’ve seen this before. The gov’t has apparently concluded that a giant slag of metal is cheaper than a missile.

You’re right that there are missiles way faster than this; this is WAY slower than orbital velocity. But I guess a hundred $10,000 slabs of metal can do way more damage at 4,500 MPH than one million-dollar missile. (I have no real idea how big the projectile is, I’m just throwing out numbers for example.)


22 posted on 03/24/2017 9:36:39 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson