Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg; DiogenesLamp; HandyDandy; WVMnteer; BroJoeK

I think your assessment is spot on. I have concluded that even if you could transport DiogenesLamp back to South Carolina in 1860 when they seceded he would argue with them that their not really seceding because of slavery.


426 posted on 05/10/2017 3:57:03 PM PDT by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies ]


To: OIFVeteran
I think your assessment is spot on. I have concluded that even if you could transport DiogenesLamp back to South Carolina in 1860 when they seceded he would argue with them that their not really seceding because of slavery.

Didn't they already have it? Wasn't it already part of the Union for "four score and seven years?"

Even so, it is irrelevant why they left. The principle articulated in the Declaration of Independence assured them of the right to leave whenever they believed the existing Government no longer represented their best interests.

440 posted on 05/11/2017 10:53:56 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson